Liam Ferguson purchased the North Pole, Alaska, airport (95Z) in May because he was looking for a suitable place to base his sonic drilling company. The equipment-heavy business requires a large footprint, and the 61-acre property was able to accommodate, with room to grow. The runway was icing on the cake.

• READ MORE: Delaware Ag Airport Sets Eyes on Growing GA Future

“When we started working in Fairbanks more often, I purchased a lot at an airstrip and ran my business out of my home there,” Ferguson said. “That was a temporary solution, and the goal was to find a block of land or a shop where we could move all of our equipment to. We looked around for about a year and the airport was for sale during this time. I thought that it was more than what we were looking for, but we started to entertain buying the airport because everything else was expensive, and I thought it would be cool as a pilot.

“Buying an airport seemed far-fetched and outside the realm of possibility, until we realized the potential that Bradley Sky Ranch had.” 

The property’s existing hangar building with dedicated office and shop space satisfied the needs of Ferguson’s business. In addition to improving the space, Ferguson has his attention focused on understanding what the future of the airport should look like.

• READ MORE: New GA Airport Near Las Vegas Has Its Eye on Space

“We have been trying to assess the place and then build from there,” he said. “Now that we have learned more about the airport, I feel like I have a pretty good long-term plan of what we are going to do. I am leaving the timeline pretty open-ended, The long-term plan is to provide rental hangars, basic maintenance services, and a full range of parking options to service local pilots. We are also talking about possibly adding an Airbnb and courtesy cars to help attract pilots to come visit. Camping spots will also be available.

“We could possibly sell some lots for hangar homes or develop some ourselves. We really do have a blank slate with this and will continue to grow it as long as we have support from the local aviation community.”

The condition of the runway at the time of purchase was satisfactory and required minimal work. After grading, compacting, and removing grass from the gravel/dirt surface, Ferguson shifted his attention elsewhere. 

“For phase one of improvements, I didn’t want to come in with all of these big plans, say we are going to do something, and have nothing change,” he said. “My goal for the summer was to talk to the people that are a part of the flying community here, to learn more about this place and get an idea of what should be improved.

“Part one is to clean up and renovate the hangar. Part two is to do dirt work on the taxiways and parking spots to improve drainage in the spring and open up more parking spots. This will also include fencing and general clean up. Part three is adding infrastructure like T-hangars, fuel, and an FBO.”

• READ MORE: Flight Training in the Scenic, Wild Last Frontier

Another key focus has been refurbishing the existing tie-downs at the airport, which had fallen into disrepair.

Ferguson advised that his commute from his hangar home to Bradley Sky Ranch is a paltry one-and-a-half-minute flight in his Cessna 205. His girlfriend and business partner, Maddy Thom, frequently joins the fray in her Cessna 150. There are currently 20 aircraft based at the airport.

The pair’s short-term goal for the airport is to stoke the energy that they’ve felt from current tenants and other Alaskan pilots. One of the ways that they plan to harness this shared enthusiasm for Bradley Sky Ranch’s future is by hosting an event at the end of the month. 

“The fly-in is going to be September 27-29, which is the first weekend after hunting season,” Ferguson said. “All of the pilots will be out of the bush at that time, and we’ve already gotten over 700 people signed up that are interested in coming to the event. This is the fourth year for the event and the second year that it’s being held here at this airport. It’s going to be something pretty big and will be a way to show people that we are cleaning up the airport. The goal is to include the community, and everyone is super excited.”

Notable aspects of the fly-in include food trucks, fire pits and camping, several live bands, and a pumpkin drop competition.

The post The Blank Slate of a North Pole Airfield appeared first on FLYING Magazine.

Early Hurdles

At first, the technical challenge of long-distance flying boiled down to the reliability of engines. As reliability improved, the central problem was to get airborne with huge loads of fuel. “Fuel fraction,” the share of an airplane’s takeoff weight that is usable fuel, is a fundamental determinant of range. When fuel fraction had grown to the limits of current technology, aerodynamic improvements—drag reduction and wings of higher aspect ratio—opened a new but narrow avenue to further progress.

Distance presented itself in different ways, depending on the destination. You could always go from New York to Paris, or at least Le Havre, France, in a ship, so the airplane changed only the time it took. But there were destinations less accessible than other continents and their capitals; of these, the most seductive were the North and South poles.

The two poles had been reached, or closely approached, on foot by Robert Peary (North Pole in 1909) and Roald Amundsen (South Pole in 1911). The appeal of reattaining those goals by air was that aircraft could more or less effortlessly achieve what had entailed unimaginable hardships and hazards for pedestrians. It would show that there was no place on Earth airplanes could not go.

Early Efforts

Among the recurrent themes of polar exploration were national rivalry and human mendacity. The precise locations of the poles were hard to determine. Recent studies put Amundsen’s fix off the true South Pole by about a mile, but he and his companions probably got within a few feet of it at one time or another during the four days they spent tramping around surveying the area.

In any case, the Earth is not a perfect sphere, so it doesn’t matter. Richard Byrd, however, who in 1926 claimed to have reached the North Pole in a Fokker Trimotor piloted by Floyd Bennett, was probably lying. The duration of his flight and the speed of the Fokker were incompatible with the out-and-return distance supposedly flown, and his logs had been tampered with after the fact.

A flight less well-known than Byrd’s was that of the Italy-built, Amundsen-directed airship Norge, which departed Svalbard (aka Spitsbergen)—an archipelago due north of Norway—three days after Byrd and alit near Nome, Alaska, three days later. Norge was not an airplane. But as far as flying over the North Pole is concerned, the fact that it took off from one side of the pole and landed at the same meridian on the other makes a persuasive case that even if it did not fly precisely over the spot, Santa may at least have seen it pass by.

The distance from Svalbard to the North Pole is 700 nautical miles; from the pole to Point Barrow, the northernmost usable airport in Alaska, is about 1,125 nm. The two locations are not quite on the same meridian—they’re about 7 degrees off—but they’re close enough that a flight from one to the other could cross the pole without feeling that it had made a big dogleg just to have a way to monopolize the conversation at subsequent cocktail parties. But then, why would you fly from Barrow to Svalbard—out of the ice-cube tray, into the freezer—except to show off?

I’ve thought about possible answers to that question. “I was on the way to Paris.” “I wanted to experience a big change in time zone.” “It’s too warm in Alaska.”

I used to think I might make that flight someday. I now suspect I won’t, but I still think about it. The distance is easily within my airplane’s range; it carries 140 gallons in wet wings and would average 160 ktas on 8.5 gph. I don’t imagine navigation would be a problem with GPS, but before GPS came along, it would have been a little trickier. The wet compass is useless; you could be flying due north toward the pole from Barrow, and it would say you were heading west. And even the most drift-free DG drifts 15 degrees an hour over the pole, because its gyro is oriented not to the turning Earth but to some unimaginably distant star.

Suppose that GPS had not come along. You would have only the sun to guide you. Picture it: You are on top of the world. The summer sun—presumably, you would do this in summer—circles the horizon from left to right, always above it, and at any given Zulu time/Greenwich Mean Time, the sun is overhead in any place whose longitude is 15 times the difference between the local time and 1200 Zulu.

• READ: More From Peter Garrison

The Barrow-Svalbard meridian is roughly one hour ahead of Zulu/Greenwich, and the Earth rotates counterclockwise, as seen from above the pole. If you imagine your airplane flying along that meridian, heading zero on a compass rose, the bearing of the sun will always be 180 degrees plus 15 times Zulu plus an hour. At 0600, for example, the sun’s bearing would be 180 plus 15 times 7, or 285 degrees.

Now, taking the bearing of the sun from inside the cockpit of an airplane might be tricky. But you could do it by turning directly toward the sun from time to time, setting your DG to zero, and then turning 165 degrees minus Zulu times 15. Suppose, for instance, it’s 0720 Zulu; you’d turn right 55 degrees. At 1500, it would be left 60 degrees (that is, a minus-60-degree turn).

Another approach, if you had a low-wing airplane, would be to secure a short, stiff vertical wire or rod to the wing surface beside the cockpit and draw a 24-hour clock face around it with 2300 pointing forward. By ensuring that your sundial continually indicated Zulu time, you would maintain your Barrow-to-Svalbard heading. You’d have to take off around 2300, though, so that the sun was always on your left; otherwise, the shadow of the fuselage would make your sundial useless.

Your assignment for tonight is to figure out the rules for the return trip.

I suppose if I ever did make this flight, I would not be too proud to use GPS for a backup. But when I made my earlier ocean flights, in the 1970s, I used only the compass and clock for navigation, and it is beguiling to think of making my way across the frozen top of the world in the same way, with the globe itself as the compass and the sun the clock.

The post Crossing the North Pole the Old-Fashioned Way appeared first on FLYING Magazine.